Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
Shop deviantART for the
holidays and save BIG!
Click here! :holly:
[x]

deviantART

:clap:
 
About Me Member Procrastinator Mew-GuyMale/United Kingdom Recent Activity Deviant for 5 Years
Needs Premium Membership
Statistics 0 Deviations
174 Comments
31,891 Pageviews

Journal

No journal entries yet.

deviantID

No deviantID yet.

Devious Info

No devious info yet.

deviantART Community Board

[x]

Comments


:icondragmir:
The link to your new site doesn't work T_T
:iconadamu-chan:
Your Avatar is cute X3

--
Good - Bad - 55% of the population



Nice looking - Evil/Smart
Nice/Smart - Ugly

-----------

Bad - Bad - 44.9% of the population



Ugly - Evil/smart

-------------

Good - Good - 0.1 % of the population


Good looking - Smart/nice
:iconmew-guy:
I'm leaving. You can find my new gallery here: [link]
:icongigmadesh200:
forget sheezyart join furaffinity
:iconeuphoria:
Enough. All parties involved with this need to stop, immediately. No more.

--
Kit Lange
Former $Core Staff
Nature Photographer
-----
[link]
Right-wing conservatives are hot.
:iconbrashthestampede:
Okay, England then. [insert bad teeth joke here]
:iconbrashthestampede:
Both of those pieces of "proof" have no credibility at all. The first, "Militant Homosexuality
and Feminism", masquerades as an academic article published in a journal. Of course, if the person has a PhD after their name, it must be legitimate, right? Wrong! I noticed this interesting letterhead: "National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality" I did some quick research - and what did I find? NARTH is an ultra conservative anti-gay organization of fringe psychologists who band together to legitimize their opinions with inaccurate academic articles. As I said, this group has no credibility at all.

The second is a tripod website that claims that feminism and equality is a hate movement simply because there is anger associated with the movement. He points out that although women claim the majority (51%) in America, men are the majority at birth, it's just that male death rates are higher. It is on this bizarre technicality that doesn't even matter that he "shoots down" another feminist claim. If you are going take this nut job for his word, then you're crazier than he is.

Maybe this shit qualifies as legitimate proof in Birmingham, but that doesn't swing in the civilized part of America. Ooooh, a South Joke! Zing! I rule.
:iconmew-guy:
"Both of those pieces of "proof" have no credibility at all. The first, "Militant Homosexuality
and Feminism", masquerades as an academic article published in a journal. Of course, if the person has a PhD after their name, it must be legitimate, right? Wrong! I noticed this interesting letterhead: "National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality" I did some quick research - and what did I find? NARTH is an ultra conservative anti-gay organization of fringe psychologists who band together to legitimize their opinions with inaccurate academic articles. As I said, this group has no credibility at all."

Sorry, but I didn't know that.

"The second is a tripod website that claims that feminism and equality is a hate movement simply because there is anger associated with the movement. He points out that although women claim the majority (51%) in America, men are the majority at birth, it's just that male death rates are higher. It is on this bizarre technicality that doesn't even matter that he "shoots down" another feminist claim. If you are going take this nut job for his word, then you're crazier than he is."

It said nothing about equality, just feminism. They aren't the same thing.

"Maybe this shit qualifies as legitimate proof in Birmingham, but that doesn't swing in the civilized part of America. Ooooh, a South Joke! Zing! I rule.

I'm not from that Birmingham, retard! I'm from the one in England!
:iconbrashthestampede:
Okay Mewguy, I've been looking at those feminazi pics that you've been posting ever since you first started them. I never read your artist's description, so I don't know the story behind them. All I know is 1) they're retarded and 2) they're ignorant as hell. So I thought to myself, "Why would Mewguy post something so retarded/ignorant?" I never gave it much thought, just thinking that perhaps you made a gaffe that you put behind you.

Oh, but then I read your most recent "no bra, no brains, all bitch" post. And I thought to myself, "This continues to be not funny. Why does he keep trying?" So I read though your comments section. Apparently I wasn't the only person who thought you were a retard. Now, I'm not familiar with "the debate" past when DA cuts off the comments, and I see you took down your old feminazi pics; however, since you put up a new one, I can see that this isn't a personal gaffe to you, it's a personal crusade.

But I still couldn't figure out why, oh why, would you think this was funny. It eluded me, my good Mewguy. But then I read one of the comments someone posted in your journal. Oh, it all made sense now. You're a fan of Maddox. Well, I refer you to the man himelf:

[link]

YOU ARE NOT MADDOX AND YOU ARE NOT FUNNY
:iconmew-guy:
More proof that feminist extremists exist: [link]

Site Map